File generated on
Why Congo’s Bishop Muteba Opposes the Referendum During War
The National Episcopal Conference of Congo (Cenco) has taken a clear stance against the proposed constitutional referendum, warning that the timing is disastrous. Bishop Fulgence Muteba, head of the Cenco, emphasized that holding such a vote while the country remains engulfed in conflict is not only unwise but deeply concerning for national stability.
Speaking from the heart of Congo’s crisis, Bishop Muteba argued that the referendum’s success hinges on peace, which currently remains elusive. The ongoing clashes between government forces and armed groups have already displaced hundreds of thousands, leaving communities in turmoil and infrastructure in ruins. In such an environment, he stated, democratic processes like referendums cannot function properly.
A Call for Stability Over Political Change
Bishop Muteba’s concerns reflect broader sentiments across Congo. Many citizens and leaders alike fear that pushing forward with the referendum could further destabilize an already fragile situation. The Bishop stressed that elections and referendums require calm and security—conditions that simply do not exist in many regions today.
He also highlighted the risks of deepening divisions within the country. With tensions high and trust in institutions low, he warned that a referendum held now could be perceived as illegitimate, exacerbating existing fractures rather than healing them.
What’s at Stake for Congo’s Future?
The proposed referendum aims to introduce sweeping constitutional changes, but its critics argue that these changes should wait until Congo is truly united. Bishop Muteba pointed out that without national cohesion, any major political reform risks being hijacked by competing interests, undermining the very purpose of the vote.
For the Congolese people, the stakes couldn’t be higher. With millions displaced and the economy struggling under the weight of war, the Bishop’s warning serves as a reminder that peace must come before political ambition. His message is clear: Congo cannot afford to gamble with its future while war rages on.
